First Post: Sunday, November 11, 2012

These guys, they all look the same. Are their looks a genetic trait, the same genetic trait responsible for their angry worldview? Or, rather, does their anger stem from looking this way, that God so willed that they should look like this? Hmmmmmm. This is a terrific question! Chicken or egg? Egg or chicken! In other words, if you look like one of these guys, are you also destined to be angry due to a larger genetic typing by which this look and this anger are evolutionarily linked? Or is it the other way around: because you lack any sort of attractiveness, you must stomp around in anger because, well, no one really wants to go through life so ugly on the outside and so you have to rage out and blame God and everyone else etc. and so on? ONLY THE SHADOW KNOWS!

There is a third path: the anger inside made them ugly on the outside!

Geneticists, behavioural scientists, dittoheads, how say you?

Free ones: Rundown…

Aqueduct 5, 6, 8
Calder 3, 4, 8
B** F*** Hollypark 7, 8, 9

Pay-side: Today…

Churchill 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10
Woodbine 3, 4, 5, 9, 10
Hawthorne 2, 6, 8, 9
Golden Gate 3, 6, 8
Turf Paradise 7, 8, 9
Zia 11

Today’s Stakes Pageantry: Tejas (Tejas!) A&M all the way, bruddahsz in upsetsz! Wonder how Chris McCarron is feeling about it. They’re all related, right? How many McCarrons can be unrelated, really?

WMF Report: See yesterday’s post, kindly. Tyvm.

Nocturnal Submission: Night off…

Thank you. Best wishes. Please join us again tomorrow for what we can dredge up for the weekly minor hit called “Monday Boxing”. Until such time, it’s goodbye. Farewell.