Trying to give some back! Unfortunately for the mutuel machines and your fellow horserace speculators, we are not able to post enough crazy (krz! cray!) issuesz today to return all the money removed from them yesterday. Hope you had ’em…complimentary (!) $502 daily doubles don’t grow on treesz! Regardsz!<\/p>\n
Speak of The Devil! As soon as you start comparing Jessica Sarah Parker-Broderick to Catherine Deneuve (by way of comparing Parker-Broderick to so-called actress Z. Mammette), Parker-Broderick quickly and emphatically dispels that notion. To wit: March 2013 cover of Chinese edition of Harper’s Bazaar<\/em>. Come on, people! There’s no room for mass ugliness in acting! We don’t want unattractive women on the screen, small or big! Please! Only Sophia Lorens or Catherine Deneuves or Grace Kellys or Julie Christies or Katharine Rosses or Jennifer Lawrences for entertainment purposes. Even Anne Hathaway is not pretty; she has that same kooky ethnic look as Liza Minnelli. No good, Johnnie, no good.<\/p>\n Hitchcock, Truman Capote…both may have been repulsive to the blondes they worshiped, but both were on the right track, no doubt! Both would have their assistants show Parker-Broderick and Z. Mammette to the door, ASAP! The filtering processes in Hollywood these days are sorely lacking.<\/p>\n Beulah<\/strong> Chas. Town<\/strong> Delta<\/strong> Thank you. Best wishes. Please join us again tomorrow for the first “First Post” post of your new racing week. Until such time, it’s goodbye. Next time!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Trying to give some back! Unfortunately for the mutuel machines and your fellow horserace speculators, we are not able to post enough crazy (krz! cray!) issuesz today to return all the money removed from them yesterday. Hope you had ’em…complimentary … Continue reading
\nRace 4: #5 Durazno<\/p>\n
\nRace 8: #9 Soul Queen<\/p>\n
\nRace 3: #10 Go ’on Now
\nRace 10: #9 C C’s Reward<\/p>\n